Song of Songs (Solomon)

By Mary Jane Chaignot

The title of this book, Solomon's Song of Songs, is derived from a literal translation of the first two words. To say in Hebrew "Song of Songs" is to express a superlative, essentially saying that this is the greatest of all songs. Rabbi Akiba was to have said, "All the Writings are holy, but the Song of Songs is the Holy of Holies." This would be a measure of its traditional importance and, indeed, it is read during one of the major Jewish Festivals (the eighth day of Passover).

The earliest interpretations of the Song of Songs considered it to be an allegory. The events were not real but are a metaphor intended to convey a particular spiritual truth. The real meaning is not on the surface or in the literal words, but from this celebration of human love is derived a deeper, hidden significance. From a Jewish perspective, the words are about a bridegroom and a bride that signify the relationship of God to Israel. Their love is an allegory of the covenant that binds God and Israel. From a Christian perspective, it is the story of Christ and his church. Some have even identified the "bride" as being the Virgin Mary.

But most modern scholars are less likely to accept such an interpretation, saying that, first of all, there is nothing in the poem to suggest it is an allegory. And if that had been the author's intention, it is devoid of any clues that would aid its interpretation. As a result, each interpreter could find whatever he or she was looking for in the text. Such findings are limited only by one's imaginations -- and have led to amazing claims. Secondly, the place and people references are not used in an allegorical manner. The references are real - names, like Solomon and Jerusalem, not Prince Charming or Mr. World. It is not likely that these are to be used as metaphors, but that they reflect real experiences.

So if it isn't an allegory, what is it? Some have suggested it is a drama. But the little book doesn't really have a clear storyline like a good drama should - at least not one that people can agree on. Scholars can't even agree on the number of speakers. Their guesses range from two to four speakers, each with obviously different scenarios. One suggestion is that it's the story of a simple country girl, smitten by her young shepherd boy, but whisked away by Solomon to his harem. At the end, she returns to her first love and all is well. Needless to say, the drama argument isn't too convincing. Nor is the claim that it reflects ancient marriage rites.

Though some of these strands may be present in the work, most scholars tend toward a literal interpretation. Primarily, the Song of Songs is a collection of love poems. Scholars argue whether it is one continuous dramatic poem or a series of originally independent songs. Either way, they concur that love poetry exists among all the literature of ancient (as well as modern) societies. Some scholars insist that it is describing an ideal marriage and the sexual relationship that is part of that marriage. But, interestingly, it makes no reference to procreation. It only says that sexual love is normal and good and should be pleasurable to both parties, making it an ode to human love. Others point out that it is unlikely that the couple is married. They have to part in the morning and the woman has a lot of trouble with her brothers and guards in the city. Also, most of the action takes place out of doors. These are issues that lovers might have to confront, but not married people. This is not to say that the Song condones or encourages sex outside the bonds of marriage, it just doesn't address it as an issue.

There are some other major omissions as well. For example, there are no direct references to God and, in fact, when the daughters of Jerusalem take an oath, they do so by gazelles and hinds. It does not mention the Torah, God's covenant, or any of His saving acts. These omissions raise the question as to how it became part of the canon. Although the earlier statement by Rabbi Akiba is thought to be a rebuke to those who questioned its inclusion in the canon, there is no actual record of any doubts. And by Jesus' time in the first century, it was accepted without question. (No doubt its Solomonic authorship had something to do with that. The first line claims that it was written by Solomon, but since the first speaker is female, that is not too likely.) In its defense, the book does speak of Jerusalem and kingship -- it even mentions David by name. But had this book been found in some dusty corner, it would probably have been considered a secular book and not much else. Although in antiquity, there was no such distinction between the sacred and the secular. God was simply involved in every aspect of their lives. But the fact remains that The Song of Songs is part of the canon. The words are about human love. But the beauty and mystery of that love stems from the Creator who is the very source of love and is love. From that standpoint, it is rooted in God's words at creation where He decreed everything to be "good."

The many segments of the book can be divided into five main categories. Each category shows how the poem functions. One category is labeled description, wherein a variety of images are used to describe physical beauty. One Arabic type (the wasf) describes parts of the body from top to bottom using architectural, military, or nature images. Encounter poems describe the sexual meetings of the lovers. These might be current or past. These sexual encounters are often illustrated through images of eating or drinking. Seeking poems portray the lovers looking for each other both inside and outside the city. Sometimes they find each other; sometimes they don't. Closely related to this are the beckoning poems, where desire is expressed. And lastly, there are poems of affirmation, oftentimes in the presence of barriers or obstacles to their love. These challenges can come in the form of family interference as well as societal. Despite these confrontations, the lovers insist on their right to have a relationship. ¹

In the Hebrew Bible, the Song of Songs is in the third section, known as the Writings. It is one of a group of books known as the Five Scrolls (the other four being Ruth, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations, and Esther) that are read in public at annual festivals. In the Septuagint and the Vulgate, it is part of the Solomonic works.

Scholars do not agree on any specific divisions.

Bibliography

Davidson, Robert. "Ecclesiastes and The Song of Solomon." Daily Study Bible Series. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1986.

Fuerst, Wesley. "The Books of Ruth, Esther, Ecclesiastes, The Song of Songs, Lamentations." The Cambridge Bible Commentary. Cambridge, Great Britain: University Press, 1973.

Murphy, Roland. "The Song of Songs." Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Press, 1990.

Murphy, R and E Huwiler. "Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs." New International Biblical Commentary. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1999.